Positional Dama: Utility Analysis With Neural Network Evaluation Function

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to Measure Mahjong Luck and Skill

Image
Every Game of Mahjong Is A Dice Roll Imagine you are playing a 4 player game of mahjong against 3 clones of yourself. The probability that you get 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th place is 25% - you're all equal in skill and playing the same strategy, so there's no reason any clone would have an advantage. The average placement you would achieve is 2.50. If you were playing against weaker players and had an average placement of 2.40, we would say that you have some edge , or advantage. Now suppose you were playing perfect mahjong against competent opponents. How much edge is possible? One estimate of the maximum possible edge would be the results of the AI LuckyJ, who has the best performance of any person or AI in the Tokujou room on Tenhou. Over 1145 games, LuckyJ's spread of placements is 31.5% 1st, 27.5% 2nd, 24.1% 3rd, and 16.7% 4th. Its average placement is 2.26. There is some selection bias in estimating the edge of perfect play using the best performance we've seen...
Read more

Push Fold Fundamentals: Winrate/Dealinrate

Image
Shoutout to hue for recommending Japanese resources and proofreading this post. Introducing The Win Dealin Ratio Your opponent declares riichi. Do you push a dangerous tile, or fold? Some players may refer to a flowchart (push good wait with X han), or a chart of expected values (EVs) to answer this question, but I think there’s a deeper understanding to be had. What is the math underlying these charts, and how can you modify your answer if parameters such as value, dealinrate, ability to fold/maneuver, or position change? I'm going to propose a heuristic that will help you answer push fold problems in a variety of circumstances. This is a concept that I borrowed from poker and modified for riichi mahjong. It’s a concept that is so important that I think about it in every game of mahjong that I play, and one that I wish I was formally taught as a beginner. It starts with a very simple idea: if I push, what percentage of the time will I win, and what percentage of the ti...
Read more

Suphx / Naga Haipai Efficiency - Part 1

Image
Riichi Mahjong AI In the world of mahjong AI, two stand out as the strongest. There is Naga, an efficient risk-taking machine, and Suphx, its risk-averse, yet highly aware counterpart. Of these two AI, Suphx is my favorite - its play is incredibly unique, regularly sacrificing tile efficiency to manage risk. Many mahjong players can find the most efficient discard in the majority of hands, but few can manage risk the way Suphx can. In this 3-part series of posts, I will be going over a variety of haipai , or opening hands, played by Suphx, and analyzing these decisions with Naga. By analyzing the decisions of these two AI, we'll take a close look at the tradeoff between efficiency, value, and risk in the early stages of a hand. I encourage readers to mentally choose the tile they would discard before scrolling down and looking at the AI decisions. Standard Order This hand is an example of the standard haipai order. In general, we cut guest winds, terminals, yakuhai, 2...
Read more